+ Reply to Thread
Page 5 of 8
FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 117

Thread: whats your favorite engine of all time?

  1. #61
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Fort Wayne, Indiana
    Posts
    3,872

    Default

    RB26DETT

    TWM Short Throw, HID's, yeah, that's it.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike View Post
    Nothing sounds better than getting raped by most of the active members on here.

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    WI
    Posts
    2,448
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ford motorsports View Post
    I am in shock that one one has mention the BOSS 429, or the BOSS 302. They are on my top. Here is my list.

    Boss 429
    Boss 302
    427 SCJ
    SB 302
    LSX
    426 Hemi
    Ford 385 series for trucks
    Just for Kicks 4.6 DOHC
    I said 302

  3. #63

    Default

    The old chevy 302.

  4. #64
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    McDonough, Georgia
    Posts
    3,486
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Also I love the Chevy 572. This guy sucks at shifting but I think maybe its the clutch. lol


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjoCT6YvNnE


    -D

  5. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by grimmszx2 View Post
    The old chevy 302.
    I thought it was 305 and fAIL?
    #20:10 TheGhostInTheMachine> sir please retard your level of anger

    E . · ` ' / · . F
    Your tears fuel me.

    99 ZX2 B&M shifter, custom intake, powder pulleys(both of them), Vit tuned SCT flip chip.
    Eclipse CD5030, Polk Audio MM651's up front, Polk Audio DB series in the back.

  6. #66

    Default

    No there were 4.9l 302's. They were only made from 1967-1969. They were a decent engine. Almost the same engine as the 350. It had a 4" bore just like the 350. It just had a 3" stroke though. The best engine of all time has to be the Ls series engines. So much power can be had on those.

  7. #67

    Default

    I had always heard just a 5.0. Thats what all the parts manuals and such call it. 302's are very rare and expensive due to how short of a period they were produced. The ones I have owned were very sweet. Really high rpm motor. The only ones I've owned wasn't 302's directly from GM. All you have to do is bore a 283 .250 over and run the 283 crank if running a small journal crank to make a 302. However, the block must be a pre 66 block or there isn't enough area to bore out.

  8. #68
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Greenville SC
    Posts
    1,728

    Default

    aircooled vw.. simple..
    rotary .. unique
    SBC for dime a dozen ease of parts

  9. #69

    Default

    Yea there werent many of the 302's made, but they were a 4.9l. Here you can read a little about them. They were very powerful back then.

    1967-1969 Z28: 302 in³ (4.9 L) Small-Block V8 290 hp @ 5800 rpm, 290 ft·lbf @ 4200 rpm

    http://www.welovecamaros.com/1st_generation_camaro.html

  10. #70
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    DSM, Iowa
    Posts
    284

    Default

    sr20vet... my future swap
    sr20det... current project

  11. #71

    Default

    Thats weird. I even looked at work today. Every manual and parts guide refers to it as a 5.0 (autozone). Even the repair manual for the 67-69 year camaros which I would think it was because the motor acctually has 302.4 CU. The good 302's were only made in 1969. Gm also underated this engine. Rumor has it that the 1969 302 engine produced 350 horsepower at 7000 rpm.

  12. #72
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    outside of charlotte, north carolina
    Posts
    2,259

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by grimmszx2 View Post
    Thats weird. I even looked at work today. Every manual and parts guide refers to it as a 5.0 (autozone). Even the repair manual for the 67-69 year camaros which I would think it was because the motor acctually has 302.4 CU. The good 302's were only made in 1969. Gm also underated this engine. Rumor has it that the 1969 302 engine produced 350 horsepower at 7000 rpm.
    only with the cross ram and 2 four barrels were they rated for that much. but everyone knew they made more power than that

    My name Is Brandon. 01 Zx2. Silver Frost. Celica spoiler. CAI w/ K&N filter. Aerospeed muffler. 19mm RSB. ATX. Lowered 2 1/2 inches up front, 2 inches in the rear. Stock foglights. 03 front bumper (traded the cf hood for it) Turbo, 5 speed coming soon

    Buy my parts: http://teamzx2.com/showthread.php/22...d-Trunk-struts
    http://teamzx2.com/showthread.php/23...om-stock-parts
    and my comics: http://teamzx2.com/showthread.php/24...mic-collection

  13. #73

    Default

    The dual 4 barrell cross ram acctually sucked for street use. The Single 4 barrel 800cfm dual feed performed much better on street. The cross ram brought the high end alive.

  14. #74

    Default

    I believe the Chevy 302 (as mentioned before, available only in the first-gen Z/28s) was made by dropping a 283 crank in a 327 block. Could be wrong, but that's what I recall.

    My list:

    1. GM's LSx family. From the 4.8 to the LS7 to the LS9, they are tough to beat in terms of power, reliability, fuel economy and compact size. Not to mention having the first application of cam-in-block variable valve timing with the L76 engine (what I have in my truck).

    2. The common-rail Cummins 5.9.

    3. The big-block Chevy. Laughably easy to make huge power with them, just that parts are a bit expensive relative to small-blocks.

    4. The Honda K-series. While I will never own a Honda, I can certainly recognize and respect quality engineering.
    2000 S/R: Cams, nitrous, FC IM, Kami header, blah blah blah
    2008 Chevy Silverado 1500 Crew Cab LTZ Vortec Max: DD and tow rig

  15. #75

    Default

    Yeah from GM its the 327 small journal block with the 283 crank. However the only differences in the 283 block and 327 is bore and the 327 has thicker webbing around the mains. Which is why a 283 can be made into one by simply boring it over. 1969 is the best year because they offered a large journal crank and 4 bolt mains.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 5 of 8
FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts